Morton Hall detention centre – a threefold rise in self-harm, increased safety concerns and continuing long-term detention

Morton Hall detention centre – a threefold rise in self-harm, increased safety concerns and continuing long-term detention

21 March 2017

There has been a threefold increase in self-harm and a decline in safety in Morton Hall immigration detention centre, according to the inspection report published today.  The report also highlights that the centre, which holds up to 392 men battling with anxiety and stress caused by the uncertainty of indefinite detention, ‘looks and feels like a prison’.

Morton Hall centre, near Lincoln, is one of two immigration detention centres run by HM Prison Service. In January this year, a young Polish man at Morton Hall took his own life, leaving his baby and his partner behind.  The baby was born on the day of the man’s death.

The inspection report links ‘the very high levels of frustration’ with the experience of unending long-term detention, and observed that for many ‘there was no clear pathway towards release’.

Just as in Brook House immigration detention centre earlier this month, the inspection team found evidence of routine long-term detention at Morton Hall.   The average length of detention was over three months, and the inspection found 31 men who had been detained over a year, including two who had been detained for over two years.  Two other men had been detained cumulatively for a total of more than three years.

The report is also critical of centre management’s use of ‘procedural and physical security measures, supported by a punitive rewards system’, without conducting any analysis as to the reasons for the high number of security incidents in the centre. The inspection team observes that ‘This approach was clearly not working’, with 38% of those surveyed saying that they did not feel safe at Morton Hall.

In addition, the standard regime was described as ‘exclusively punitive – which was inappropriate and unusual to see in an IRC (Immigration Removal Centre).’  The inspection team also repeated their earlier recommendation that officers stop carrying batons.

The report puts further pressure on the Government to deliver its promised detention reform.  During Westminster Hall Debate last week, the Immigration Minister was heavily criticized for ignoring many of the recommendations made by the Parliamentary Inquiry into Use of Immigration Detention and the government-commissioned Shaw Review.  While both inquiries concluded that UK must immediately reform its current practice of detaining far too many people for far too long, the latest statistical information shows no change.

The UK remains as an outlier in Europe and is the only country with no time limit over immigration detention.  Recently, the Council of Europe´s anti-torture committee (CPT) clarified its view in its fact sheet on standards on immigration detention that ‘the prolonged detention of persons under aliens legislation, without a time limit and with unclear prospects for release, could easily be considered as amounting to inhuman treatment.’

Lisa Matthews, Coordinator at Right to Remain said:

“The harm and uncertainty of detention rings out clearly in this carefully worded report. All of the people we work with who have experienced detention are marked by it: the harm does not end with release.  The policy of detention is proof of a society harming itself – locking tens of thousands of people up every year, with many more living in constant fear this will happen to them.  Every day that the government stalls on its promised fundamental reform of detention is another day of uncertainty, fear and harm for those at risk of detention and those detained right now.”

Eiri Ohtani, Project Director of the Detention Forum said:

“The inspection report shows an abandoned group of people held under a punitive regime behind razor wire. Despite immigration detention’s colossal human and financial cost, many centres’ remoteness lets the government continue to regard them as ‘out of sight, out of mind’. Just last week, a group of cross-party MPs challenged the Immigration Minister on his inaction.  It’s time that the Minister sits up and starts developing community-based alternatives to detention.”   

You can read our live Q & A session with ‘Dave’ at Morton Hall in November last year here

Long-term detention of migrants remains unaddressed at Brook House detention centre

10 March 2017 (updated at 11:40am 10 March 2017)

In the report published today, the Prison Inspector urges the Home Office to take a ‘remedial action’ to address continuing long-term immigration detention of migrants, after finding a number of cases of excessive detention at Brook House Immigration Removal Centre.

During the inspection of Brook House Immigration Removal Centre near Gatwick Airport in October and November 2016, the inspection team found 23 individuals who had been detained for over a year.  Four of these had been detained for over two years and the longest period of detention they found was two and a half years.

With a major Westminster Hall debate on immigration detention taking place in a few days’ time, the report provides further proof of the government’s failure to deliver detention reform, more than a year later after it was pledged by the Government. 

While acknowledging general improvements in detention condition at Brook House, the inspection team is critical of the fact that no analysis has been conducted by the Home Office on why average length of detention increased from 28 days to 48 days since the previous inspection in 2013.  The report states ‘(i)n the absence of such analysis, it was hard to see how detention periods could be systematically reduced and the inevitably negative outcomes for detainees mitigated’.  The inspection also found that the average cumulative length of detention was three months, which was described as ‘too long’. 

The UK remains the only country in Europe that detains migrants without a time limit.  Over the years, this policy has received severe criticism by a number of bodies, including the Shaw Review, the government’s own review of immigration detention which published in January 2016 and the cross-party Parliamentary Inquiry into the Use of Immigration Detention who produced their report in 2015.  The UK’s National Preventative Mechanism, to which the Prison Inspector belongs, also called for a time limit on immigration detention.   

Eiri Ohtani, Project Director of the Detention Forum said:

‘That the UK detains migrants without a time limit for administrative convenience is shameful.  That the UK has been failing to address this damaging and expensive practice is doubly shameful.  The UK has been able to introduce a time limit for families with children and pregnant women: it must be possible to introduce a similar policy for other categories of individuals.’

‘Jon’ who took part in Unlocking Detention’s live Q & A session last year from Brook House where he had been detained described his experience of indefinite detention as follows:

James Wilson, Director of Gatwick Detainee Welfare Group which regularly visits Brooks House IRC said:

“We welcome this detailed report by HMIP and the progress detention centre staff have made since the last inspection.  But the underlying picture remains disturbing.  As one of those held in detention is quoted as saying in the report: ‘I feel like a prisoner without a crime’.  This is precisely what Brook House and other UK detention centres are: prisons without criminal convictions, and without the safeguards and time limits that protect the rights of those in prison. “

 =================================================

You can read ‘Jon’s Q & A session here.

The Detention Forum’s analysis of the latest immigration detention statistics is here.